Athleticism and older women

I took a day off from bookwriting today to run in the Charlottesville Women’s Four-miler. Nowadays, they have these snazzy little chips you tie into your shoelaces that record something near to your actual time– I think they trigger as you cross the Start line and as you cross the Finish line. This annual race has grown so large I didn’t even cross the Start line till the clock showed 0:55.
So here are the results. I came in #802 out of 2,240 women who finished the race. My chip-time was 41:24. In the 50-54 age group I came in 68th out of 217 women (i.e., just at the one-third point.)
Since I am 54 this year, that means I’m in the oldest age-cohort in the group. It also means next year I’ll be in the 55-59’s.
So here are two slightly depressing aspects of this:
(1) I am definitely slowing down. In 2005 I clocked 40:13— and they didn’t have the chip-timing system in place then! (So I still fondly hang onto the idea that “actually”, I came in under 40 minutes??)
(2) My feet hurt horribly after today’s race. They’ve been hurting quite a lot recently, especially at the start of my usual three-mile run. But today, for much of the day since the early morning race I’ve been hobbling around like an old lady.
Okay, no more whining. I am still incredibly lucky to have great health and mobility. I’ve sometimes thought how unprecedented it is to have such huge cohorts of older– and generally wiser?– women still surviving in the rich countries these days, as opposed to the proportion (or, of course, number) of women who would have survived in good health to these ages in earlier centuries.
I delivered and raised three incredible children. I didn’t die in childbirth. And though raising them while working was extremely tiring and stressful at times, I survived that with health and sanity more or less intact. (A huge bouquet to fellow-parent Bill-the-spouse for that.)
… And then, going out this morning to the stunning beauty of sunrise over the Virginia Piedmont and seeing 2,200 other healthy women all out there too– huge numbers of them my age or older, and many of them with supportive spouses and kids in tow– that was a great experience.
I had my own little dream there. Wouldn’t it have been great if we could have taken all that sheer womanpower running on up to DC to encircle the Pentagon and tell the Bush people to just bring the soldiers home?
Well, my experience in life has taught me that not all women are as antiwar as we might like. (Condi Rice!!! Maggie Thatcher!!! Jeane Kirkpatrick!!! etc.) But still, I really do think there is a gender tilt in bellophilia/bellophobia. I think that having large numbers of healthy, well-educated older women is going to be good for US democracy and for the restoration of US values of fairness and caring, over the years ahead.
Okay, back to the book. (And an Advil or two?)

7 thoughts on “Athleticism and older women”

  1. First congratulations for the race although you looks slow in this race but anyway you did fine, it is the your good sprits driven you to be a healthy, well-educated women is going to be good for US democracy, who and your believers or like you should be more active and affective to be more productive to bring the change to life for better future and more human US sprits towards the rest of humans around the world as first built 400 years ago.
    BTW, talking about Condi Rice! The news brings us this:
    US challenges subpoenas for Secretary of State Rice and others in spy case
    http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=120957
    But the list of this smi-wemen misses the older one and most pathetic one Madelyn Albright!

  2. You are an inspiration to progressive women with an interest in Middle East Politics in so many ways! I loved your account of the run/race and its significance for you!

  3. I wish to add my congratulations to you for just running the race. Your blog is a nice mix of news and items from your life.

  4. Come on Helena
    August is over. Time to get back to the Fire and Brimstone
    People who have an hour to spare might benefit from reading this.
    http://www.rawstory.com/images/other/IranStudy082807a.pdf. The casualty predictions look realistic. Perhaps it is just as well that we didnt nuke the Iraqi WMD sites in 2003.
    People as old as you and I are supposed to give wise council to the youth.
    The news in the UK is about British Generals complaining of American Military Lunacy.
    Mike Jackson and Tim Cross are both in the paper.
    By the way

  5. I’ve always thought that the dynamism and robust vitality of the American economy owe a lot to the fact that we enabled a previously ignored national resource-our women.

Comments are closed.