Danny Rubinstein of HaAretz has an interesting article in Thursday’s paper, in which he writes that PA President Mahmoud Abbas is facing a tough new challenge from other veteran leaders in (primarily) the exile wing of Fateh.
These internal insurgents are reportedly– and not surprisingly– being led by long-time Fateh/PLO veteran Farouq Qaddumi (Abul-Lutf), who lives mainly in Damascus.
Rubinstein writes that the big Fateh bosses had been preparing for a meeting of their movement’s 15-person Central Committee, due to be held this week in Amman. But,
- Abbas did not get the support he expected from his colleagues on the committee. The situation was so bad that the gathering was canceled – though officially, it was merely postponed for a week…
Thus Abbas now finds himself embroiled in infighting and tension not only with Hamas, but also inside his own movement. And those who are supposed to back him up – the United States, the Quartet, the Arab states and Israel – consider him to be a weak leader who makes a lot of mistakes.
Under any other circumstances, Abbas would have resigned his post. But now, his aides maintain, this possibility does not exist, since it would mean relinquishing all power in the Palestinian Authority to Hamas. His associates say that as a leader with a sense of national responsibility, he cannot quit…
This is about a lot more than protocol. It is about a bitter struggle for power: Kaddoumi and two other members of the central committee, Ahmed Ghnayem and Mohammad Jihad, are veteran opponents of the peace process and the Oslo Accords, and refuse to come to the territories.
Abbas had asked Kaddoumi and his two colleagues to return, at least to the Gaza Strip, which Israel evacuated. However, they have refused, arguing that the Israeli occupation of Gaza is still not over.
Moreover, Abbas was informed that Kaddoumi had visited Damascus and met there with Meshal about how to include Hamas in the PLO and what positions Hamas leaders would receive in the Palestinian national leadership.
Both Kaddoumi and Meshal believe that the Palestinian leadership should not be based in the territories, since there, it is at Israel’s mercy. Abbas and his supporters maintain that the leadership in the territories enjoys more freedom of action than has been granted to Palestinian politicians by the Syrian regime in Damascus.
One serious problem for Abbas is that veteran members of the Fatah Central Committee do not fully support him. Some clashed with him during the period when there was friction between him and Arafat; others have personal gripes against him.
In an effort to counter this problem, Abbas developed ties with younger members, such as Mohammad Dahlan and Jibril Rajoub, and he is pressing to add 21 younger members to the central committee, whose 15 current members are in their seventies and refuse to allow any changes.
This mess is having a negative effect on Abbas’ ability to deal with both the Hamas government in Gaza and the Hamas leadership in Damascus. Despite backing from Jordan and Egypt, Abbas has been unable to convince Hamas even to accept the Arab peace initiative, which calls for recognition of Israel in return for a withdrawal to the 1967 lines. The question now is whether Abbas has the strength to announce the dissolution of the Hamas government, thereby risking the possibility of civil war.
Ah, Abul-Lutf. A very vain and silly man. But certainly, someone who by the end of the of the 1990s was able to capture the zeitgeist of that large portion of Fateh supporters forced to live for many decades now in exile outside the homeland– people who had been warily prepared to give the “Oslo” process a chance to succeed but to whom Oslo never offered anything. Period.
It strikes me that Abu Mazen was simply showing his political naviety yet again if he put any hope into the chance that the exile wing of Fateh might back him up in his present power struggle against Hamas. Aleksandr Kerensky, anyone?