Netherlands, art, jurisprudence, etc

We’re in Amsterdam at nearly the end of our fabulous summer trip. It was good to start in Venice and end here. Both cities have a lot in common. Not only the reclaimed-from-the-swamps aspect of them– leaving them both laced with such a great network of canals. But also the role each city played back at the beginning of the European Ascendancy.
That was kind of why it felt appropriate for me to be writing in the CSM this week about the European / North Atlantic Ascendancy coming near its end.
On Thursday and Friday, in The Hague, I was able to conduct some really excellent interviews. These were with:

    — the Chief Prosecutor of the new ICC, Luis Moreno-Ocampo (from Argentina),
    — the Deputy President of the Int’l Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia, Judge Kevin Parker (from Australia), and
    — one of the judges on the Appeals Bench opf the ICC, Judge Navanethen Pillay (from South Africa.)

I found all of them to be intelligent, very sympathetic people who have evidently thought very deeply about the roles of their respective institutions within the emerging international society. All of them had (I think) previously read the article I had recently in Foreign Policy, which was quite critical of the role of their courts. So honestly, I was prepared for some of them to be a bit defensive and close-mouthed. But they weren’t at all. On the contrary. They all seemed really happy to grapple with the tough issue that I raised in that article; and they all seemed to have thought very deeply about these issues themselves, beforehand. Much more deeply, I would say, than most of the chorus of international court boosters in the western human rights movement, some of whom seem to have little idea about the gravity of very basic rights issues in soecieties reeling from war and atrocity.
So anyway, that was all good– and it provides a great basis for the visit to Uganda, which I’ll embark on tomorrow, from Schipol airport.
… Yesterday, we went to the Rijksmuseum here. I last visited it in 1995, when I came to Amsterdam (and also The Hague) on a short visit with my daughter Lorna, then aged 10, and my father, James Cobban, then aged 85. I think it was the last significant trip we made with JM before he passed away in 1999. He loved Amsterdam! I have great memories of him jumping on and off trams like a teenager, and just drinking everything in. (“What’s that funny smell?” he asked at one point as we walked past some kind of a joint joint. “H’mm, haven’t a clue,” I said, insouciantly.)
Anyway, most of the Rijksmuseum is currently closed for renovation. But what they have open is an unbelievably rich and well-presented collection of just about 200 of their greatest treasures. (It’s also the 400th anniversary of Rembrandt’s birth this year, so Amsterdam is celebrating that, too.)
In the show, they had one room on the theme of “Global Expansion”, which just perfectly showcased the contribution that the Netherlands’ global empire-building activities made to its rise as a prosperous and self-confident European power.
I just get this sense in so many places in Europe now. Especially after I read Hugh Thomas’s masterly history of the global slave trade.
Thursday afternoon,when we were still in The Hague, we went to the Mauritshuis, which has always been one of my very favorite art museums. That is, until I learned from Hugh Thomas that Prince Maurits had made the vast bulk of his fortune purely from the profits of trading in enslaved African persons… Yes, it does affect how I look at the institution– if not, necessarily, at the art within it.
I guess I just came away from those experiences in the Mauritshuis and the Rijksmuseum with this very vivid sense of how much of the European Ascendancy in world affairs had actually been funded and underpinned through imperial rapine, their maintenance of tight control over international trade flows, and the deep involvement of so many European powers in the intercontinental (and particularly transatlantic) transport and trading of millions of enslaved persons.
And meantime, there were all these brutal Dutch (and other) colonial profit-takers and slave-traders commissioning the most wonderful artists back at home in Amsterdam to produce these wonderfully delicate portrayals of the settled and serene domestic life they were able to maintain at home… Hard to all think through. I’m still feeling the dissonance rather viscerally.

5 thoughts on “Netherlands, art, jurisprudence, etc”

  1. Well, The Hague is of course not just in but also the capital of the Netherlands. Which has its own ghastly colonial history to reckon with (Cape Colony, Indonesia, slavetrading etc etc) as well as its more recent failings e.g. at Srebenica.
    Five years ago I did spend a couple of days in Belgium and went to Antwerp- the port from which all those Belgian trading ships sailed in Leopold’s day (as told in the Hochschild book you linked to)– and in Brussels. In Brussels I went to the “Royal Africa Museum”, established in one of the many lovely palaces that LKeopold built with his misgotten gains. Most of it was very ordinary ethnographic shlock, presented in a way that had the Congolese “natives” presented alongside big game as sort of quirks of nature (as opposed to, as fellow human persons…) It also had a “Hall of Memory” which I was eager to see: Would it present (or act as) some sort of symbolic reparation to the natives peoples of Congo wiped out by Leopold’s ghastly project?
    No, indeed! Who was “remembered” there were a handful of “brave Belgian explorers” and also the dreadful imperialist, Stanley, who had lost their lives in the course of the imperial venture.
    I’m not sure how Belgian historiography and museum curation has progressed since 2001… Maybe not much?
    (Also, the Belgians had their own recent moment of inglory in Rwanda, in 1994.)

  2. Helena, I am so impressed by your correspondence from Holland. I had doubts that a white person can ever come to this depth of perception about the splendor of Europe, and the dirty history behind it – how it was amassed. I see, how Edward Said came to his idea of ‘cultural imperialism’ – because he was from ‘both worlds’. I grew to understand this issue because I married a person from the ‘other world’ – and this opened my eyes – and that is why I know how difficult or even impossible it is for a ‘normal’ Westerner to comprehend these issues. But, the colonializm and exploitation is not the monopoly of the european culture, all skin colors can be accused of the same behavior.
    your blog is very good and I recommended it to my friends. I also read your columns in the CSM.

Comments are closed.