They don’t want to call it a draft but it sure ain’t your father’s “all-volunteer military” any more…
The WaPo ran a big front-page piece today about the various stop-loss programs that have been implemented by the US armed forces. The idea is that people who have already in the past contracted to enter military duty in either the regular forces, the reserves, or the National Guard can have the termination dates of those contracts summarily postponed by the service in question if it feels a pressing need to “stop the loss” from various units.
In the piece, Lee Hockstader writes about Staff Sgt. Peter G. Costas, a Texan and an Army Reserve interrogator in an intelligence unit who was due to retire from the reserves last May. Hockstader writes:
- “An enlistment contract has two parties, yet only the government is allowed to violate the contract; I am not,” said Costas, 42… He has now been told that he will be home late next June, more than a year after his contractual departure date. “Unfair. I would not say it’s a draft per se, but it’s clearly a breach of contract. I will not reenlist.”
Hockstader writes about a number of other service members who feel similarly violated by the “stop-loss” orders. He (she?) should have talked to Marine’s Girl, whose blog was the first place that I learned about this eery new phenomenon.
MG wrote about stop-loss here and here.
The second of those posts was written Dec 20, a few days after her Marine got back to the US on an unexpected leave. In it, she relayed part of an IM session she and he had just held. He was still held “captive” at that point on an un-named Marines base where he had to go through around two weeks of mandatory “counseling”. In the course of it, his “counselor” had reportedly urged him to give up any emotional entanglements he had back home…
So here’s a portion of the IM session, as posted by MG:
- Me: I’m very glad you are back home. I have to worry about you much less, it is like a huge weight has been lifted from me. I’ve missed you terribly.
Marine: The thing I needed to tell you is this…my contract was extended during war time, which is a common occurance. It is looking like I am going to have to return to battle whether I want to or not.
Me: Stop loss got you?
Marine: My fate, at least for now, is sealed. I have to do my duty…but I refuse to bring anyone else with me. I do not want to continue to drag you along.
That thing about “refusing to continue to drag you along” was what the Counselor From Hell had urged him to say to her…
Once they were able to talk on the phone rather than merely thru cyberspace, plucky, persistent old MG was apparently able to talk a bit more loving sense into him… And later posts on her blog reported that he made it to her place by Christmas Eve and they had a grand ol’ Christmas together…
Anyway, check out the whole blog, and leave her a big hug on one of her Comments pages!
So, back for a last moment to the WaPo story, Hockstader reports that by using stop-loss orders, “the Army alone has blocked the possible retirements and departures of more than 40,000 soldiers, about 16,000 of them National Guard and reserve members who were eligible to leave the service this year. Hundreds more in the Air Force, Navy and Marines were briefly blocked from retiring or departing the military at some point this year.”
He (?she) quotes military sociologist Charles Moskos as saying that this widespread use of stop-loss orders, “reflects the fact that the military is too small, which nobody wants to admit.”
The stop-loss seems hard on ALL the service members involved. But it seems it has been used disproprotionately against members of the Guard and reserve. This places huge burdens on them and their families– especially since they usually don’t get even the same level of health benefits etc that the regular military get.
Let’s hope all these people and their families start urgently contacting their representatives in Congress. Blatantly involuntary service should be ended NOW. Bring ALL the troops home!