A little closer to Fallujah

Ha! I’ve got a very expensive connection here at our hotel in Damascus.
Last night we took a really interesting quick tour of the Old City etc by car, then had dinner at a place high up on Jebel Kassioun overlooking the twinkling lights of the city. Our host talked a bit about how anguished most Syrians, especially those in the northeast of the country, feel about the events in Fallujah.
Ilana Ozemoy has a very sobering piece of reporting from Falluj-ozny in today’s US News & World Report

    Once the sky stopped raining fire and the smoke from the tank cannons vanished, it was time to pick up the pieces. But where to start? What had been houses were now piles of brick and glass, demolished by 500-pound bombs. Whole city blocks were leveled, the rubble and mangled carcasses of cars pushed to the sides of the streets by the force of Abrams tanks. In crushing the Sunni insurgents who had laid claim to the streets, U.S. and Iraqi forces left Fallujah looking like a city ripped asunder by a hurricane. “It’s in bad shape. I don’t know what they [residents] have to come back to,” said Sgt. 1st Class John Ryan of the 1st Infantry’s Division Task Force 2-2…
    Rooting out a thousand or so insurgents in Fallujah required American commanders to commit some 10,000 troops, reinforced by punishing air power. The Army’s 1st Infantry Division, lacking the number of soldiers necessary to search every house, employed its tanks, blasting heavy cannon rounds in answer to snipers’ gun-and mortar fire to minimize time–and U.S. casualties. “You never want to destroy someone’s city like this. These people have worked hard for what they have,” said Staff Sgt. David Bellavia, of Task Force 2-2’s Alpha Company. “But this was the only way to eliminate those fanatics.”
    … While some houses survived with little damage, whole swaths of the city were made virtually unlivable. On the eastern side of Fallujah, which suffered some of the heaviest fighting, the front of one house looked as if it had been sliced off with a bread knife. The upstairs bedroom remained intact, a small vase of plastic roses sitting undisturbed above a perfectly made bed while the guts of the house spilled into the front yard, burying a man caked with blood and dust.
    …with weeks to go before the electricity is turned on and serious reconstruction work begins, Fallujah risks becoming a sequel to the battle for Baghdad–a quick, effective military operation, followed by a slow and problematic reconstruction effort. What Iraqis have seen so far are the images of scorched neighborhoods and wounded civilians looped on Arab satellite TV newscasts, and those who survived the fighting angrily condemned the military tactics. “There was no food, no water, no electricity–just the smell of gunpowder,” recalled Muhsan Fuad, 30, who fled his house in Fallujah’s Jolan neighborhood a few days after the offensive began, transporting the remains of a cousin killed by mortar fire. “It’s a war for freedom and democracy where there is no mercy, no law, no difference between men, women, and children. This is the American way of democracy?”

By the way, the piece is titled “Destroying it to save it?”.

On the road to Damascus

In about an hour I’ll be leaving Beirut to go to Damascus for a few days. Returning here Wednesday. Then next weekend (God, or mainly the Iranian visa authorities, willing) we’ll be going to Iran, to a conference on Islam and Democracy in Mashhad.
I’m unclear what the possibilities for posting from Damascus will be. But even if I can’t post, I’ll try to write some things that I can put up once I get back here Wednesday.
Hey, who knows what transformational lightning might strike on the road to Damascus this time? One of the biggest things that happened to me on it in the past is that, stuck at the border awaiting permission to enter one time in the late 1970s, I read a book that ended up changing my life.
No, it wasn’t the Bible. Some day I might tell you that whole story….

Fallujah, Grozny, Jenin…

The International Committee for the Red Cross, which is the global guarantor and depository for the laws of war, yesterday issued another of its strong statements about the actions of the combatants (including American combatants) in Iraq.
Since the situation is so grave, and the ICRC statement so precise and well-crafted,I’m going to copy the whole text of it into this post. After that, I have a few reflections of my own.
Here’s the statement:

    As hostilities continue in Falluja and elsewhere, every day seems to bring news of yet another act of utter contempt for the most basic tenet of humanity: the obligation to protect human life and dignity. This week it was the killing of a wounded fighter and of yet another hostage

Trainor on Fallujah, etc.

Retired 3-star Marine General Bernard Trainor is sort of an intellectual’s military leader. Well, they like to fawn all over him at Harvard University’s prestigious “Kenndy School of Government”, where he helps run a security-studies program. Here’s his take on whether the US military has in mind any “exit strategy” from Iraq:

    I don’t think they have an exit strategy in mind at this particular point. I think the concept is to maintain our forces in there. Do we need more forces? Yes, we [do], but that’s a double-edged sword. If we start to put more American forces in, all that does is agitate the people who feel that this is an American occupation. But we do need the forces.

Are you feeling more secure yet? Are you reassured that the Prez sho’ looks as though he knows what he’s fixin’ to do in Iraq?
… Well, neither do I.
The above quote comes in the latest of the periodic little “interviews” conducted with Trainor by Bernie Gwertzman, a retired national-security correspondent for AP who now works at the Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. He puts them out in a handy little column that the CFR produces and distributes jointly with the NYT.
(Have we mentioned enough “prestigious”– equals East Coast, old money– US institutions yet? I’m sure you get the drift.)
Trainor was generally laudatory about what the US fighting men had achieved in Fallujah. Speaking about the Fallujah operation in a notable past tense (!) he said:

    They all did very well… I think the performance of the army and the Marines is probably indistinguishable. The First Marine Expeditionary Force is the lead in the operation. [The operation] was very, very well planned, and I think they caught the insurgents by surprise because they feinted as if they were going to come from the south and, in fact, came from the north. When the Marines went in there shooting with lots of support, the issue was never in doubt. I think it went very quickly, and I think it worked with surprisingly low casualties.

Also, this:

Continue reading “Trainor on Fallujah, etc.”

More on Kevin Sites

I’m a bit behind the curve here– but I found this interesting story about photog Kevin Sites in yesterday’s NYT. It quoted Sites as saying that:

    he had received hate mail and threats since the broadcast, in edited form, on the initial NBC News report. A comment section on a Web site he maintains has been shut down because of death threats.

Death threats?? Because of what? Because he was doing his job?
I certainly hope all the law enforcement agencies in the US and elsewhere are conducting extensive investigations into who made those terroristic threats, and that those people will be dealt with with all the power of the law.

    Update: They could start by checking out the authors of some of the comments posted here.

Robert F. Worth, the author of the NYT piece, adds: “Mr. Sites has maintained a low profile since emerging from the fighting in Falluja, avoiding the area where other reporters on the base are billeted.” I wonder what kind of solidarity–or possibly its opposite?– they have been offering him?
Kevin does have his own blog. He’s a freelancer, working on contract for NBC. The footage from the mosque was, of course, produced as part of a “pool report”, which meant that access to all of it had to be equal to all pool members.
His blog has written posts and photos. On Nov. 10th, he was already in (or near) Fallujah. He wrote ,

    The Marines are operating with liberal rules of engagement.
    “Everything to the west is weapons free,” radios Staff Sgt. Sam Mortimer of Seattle, Washington. Weapons Free means the marines can shoot whatever they see — it’s all considered hostile.

He also wrote:

Continue reading “More on Kevin Sites”

Riverbend’s family “celebrates” Eid

The Eid al-Fitr, which comes at the end of Ramadan, is a much-loved Muslim family feast. Families gather for long visits. The kids get new outfits. Everyone eats a lot and reminisces. Good family time. You know, like Christmas or Easter for Christians, Pesach for Jews. Every religious or national community has such festivals.
It wasn’t so much fun for Riverbend’s family in Baghdad this year. They had finaly been able to get together, and the television was playing Al-Jazeera when the infamous mosque-shooting tape came on. Here’s how River describes it:

    We sat, horrified, stunned with the horror of the scene that unfolded in front of our eyes. It’s the third day of Eid and we were finally able to gather as a family- a cousin, his wife and their two daughters, two aunts, and an elderly uncle. E. and my cousin had been standing in line for two days to get fuel so we could go visit the elderly uncle on the final day of a very desolate Eid. The room was silent at the end of the scene, with only the voice of the news anchor and the sobs of my aunt. My little cousin flinched and dropped her spoon, face frozen with shock, eyes wide with disbelief, glued to the television screen, “Is he dead? Did they kill him?” I swallowed hard, trying to gulp away the lump lodged in my throat and watched as my cousin buried his face in his hands, ashamed to look at his daughter.
    “What was I supposed to tell them?” He asked, an hour later, after we had sent his two daughters to help their grandmother in the kitchen. “What am I supposed to tell them- ‘Yes darling, they killed him- the Americans killed a wounded man; they are occupying our country, killing people and we are sitting here eating, drinking and watching tv’?” He shook his head, “How much more do they have to see? What is left for them to see?”

Continue reading “Riverbend’s family “celebrates” Eid”

Fallujah battle continues

    Update, Thursday 1400 GMT: In addition to all the following, even the New York Times is reporting that “Senior Marine intelligence officers in Iraq are … emphasizing that expectations for improved conditions [in Fallujah] have not been met.” Sounds bad, huh? Read the whole piece there.

I’ve seen confirmation elsewhere of my earlier surmise that the US/Allawist assault on Fallujah was timed to be over by November 22, the day the “Reconstructing Iraq” conference is due to open in Sharm al-Shaikh, Egypt…
Well, the best-laid plans can go awry. The resisters/insurgents in Fallujah are still very active in several parts of the city, according to this report on Al-Jazeera.net this morning.
The report quotes Iraqi journalist Fadil al-Badrani, who is still in the city, as saying:

    “Fierce resistance is still raging with rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs) and machine guns against the US forces stationed on the outskirts of Falluja.”
    … Badrani said American war planes and tanks had resorted to bombing the holdout sectors of the city and some areas were still not under their control.
    “Clashes are still continuing the southern and eastern edges of the town. US forces have so far failed to storm the northern al-Julan neighbourhood,” he said.
    He added that US-led forces had abandoned al-Julan and the northern parts of the city, resorting shelling and aerial bombing those areas.

The reports in the western media about aerial bombing raids over parts of the city offer confirmation of the view that: (1) fierce resistance is continuing, and (2) there are sizeable parts of the city over which the US forces notably do not exercize on-the-ground control. If they did, then (1) they wouldn’t need the aerial bombardments, and (2) the air attacks would actually be impossible, given the density of US forces present on the ground throughout the whole city.

Continue reading “Fallujah battle continues”

For Margaret, and all her compatriots

Margaret, I never met you. I wish we’d had the chance to meet…

    This, from today’s Guardian, about Margaret Hassan:
    Hassan was born Margaret Fitzsimmons in Ireland, where her early childhood was spent in a Dublin suburb. Later, her family moved to London, where she completed her education.
    In 1961, when she was 17, she met and married Iraqi-born Tahseen Ali Hassan, who was 26 years old and studying engineering in the UK. In 1972, she moved with her new husband to Iraq, where she began working for the British Council, teaching English to Iraqis. Falling in love with the country, she learnt Arabic, converted to Islam and became an Iraqi citizen.

Continue reading “For Margaret, and all her compatriots”

It’s going to get worse. Much worse.

So you thought US foreign policy in Bush’s first term was as bad as it could get??
Ha-ha-ha. Does Unca Dick Cheney have some surprises in store for you.
Those talented and straight-talking Knight-Ridder journos Warren P. Strobel and Jonathan S. Landay wrote yesterday that:

    U.S. officials and foreign policy analysts said Monday that by agreeing to Powell’s departure and approving a purge by new CIA chief Porter Goss, Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney appear to be eliminating the few independent centers of power in the U.S. national security apparatus and cementing the system under their personal control.
    Powell and his State Department team – quietly backed by the intelligence community – argued often for a foreign policy that was more inclusive of allies and that relied on diplomacy and coercion rather than on force to deal with adversaries.

Strobel and Landay also report that some of Powell’s friends said he had “hoped to stay on a little longer”.
Bombs-Away Don will be staying on, meanwhile, and of course Condi’s heading over to State. S & L have this great quote from the Brookings Institution’s Ivo Daalder… (read on)

Continue reading “It’s going to get worse. Much worse.”

Fallujah war crimes

I want to write three things in this post:

    (1) A question: If a Marines unit with an embedded press photographer traveling with it acts in the way described by NBC photog Kevin Sites — then how do you think the many, many units that don’t have a press person embedded with them are acting??
    (More on Sites’ testimony, below)
    (2) A strong concern: After the very damaging battles Israel waged against the Jenin refugee camp, in spring 2002, the main concern of the Israeli authorities was to prevent for as long as possible any entry into the camp by anyone who could classify as an independent observer of the carnage within.
    Bassically, they want to be able to “clean up” as many of the signs of carnage within the battle-zone as possible before such observers got any chance to see it. (Also, who knows? Maybe to plant a few bits of apparently incriminating “evidence” here and there.)
    Those kept out of Jenin camp– for some 12 agonizing days after the end of the battle there, as I recall– included press people, residents of the camp who, earlier having fled their homes, were desperate to return to them and to their loved ones left behind–
    Plus, crucially, it included all local and international humanitarian aid organizations. That delay prevented the provision of adequate lifesaving services to the people still inside the camp and caused additional deaths and suffering.
    I am extremely worried that, having played by “Jenin rules” for so long during the war in Iraq, the US authorities will also try to apply “Jenin rules” on this question of humanitarian access to Fallujah, too.
    (Update: This Al-Jazeera report seems to indicate that “Jenin rules” are already in operation. In it, Asma Khamis al-Muhannadi, an assistant doctor who witnessed the US and Iraqi National Guard assault on Falluja hospital, is reported as saying that, “the medical staff received threats from the interim Iraqi health minister who said if anyone disclosed information about the raid, they would be arrested or dismissed from their jobs.” Read the rest of her chilling report there, too.)
    (3) A suggestion: This issue of humanitarian access to Fallujah (and all other Iraqi cities that the US forces are now “bombing in order to save them”) is one that concerned people around the world–and especially inside the US– should focus activities on. It is a way that, if we can bring enough pressure to bear, we can actually hope to save lives.
    I realize that “humanitarian access now!” may not be a very snappy slogan. But something like: “Fallujah! Let the Red Cross in!” could work well.
    JWN commenter “Susan in NC” helpfully gave us the “comment line” numbers for the White House: (202) 456-1112 and (202) 456-1111. Call up and leave your message there. Write to your Congress-person and Senators. Get out on the streets in peace demonstrations. Write to local and national media.
    Focusing on this point (and on the broader point of the need to abide by the laws of war) is, I think, really important right now. At the same time, “Bring the toops home” or “Support the troops– bring them home” is still the best larger theme.

Anyway, now I want to go back to the content of Kevin Sites’ recollection of what he saw. Here it is:

Continue reading “Fallujah war crimes”