The UN and Palestine–view from Beijing
I’m here in Beijing as an Expert Speaker at the “UN Meeting for Asia and
the Pacific on the Question of Palestine”. The UN’s Division of Palestinian
Affairs holds these conferences periodically in different places around the
world– I’ve been invited a few times before, but was only previously able
to go to one of them– in Malta, 1992.
I think this may be the first one in Beijing: significant both because China
is a member of the Permanent Five members of the Security Council, and because
of China’s steadily rising role in world affairs. Remember, this time
30 years ago, the PRC was still not allowed even to be in the United Nations,
since the US still insisted on giving China’s seat in the UN to Taiwan. Last
week, when Chinese Premier Wen was in Washington, he scored a notable political
success by getting Dubya to publicly warn Taiwan that it should do nothing
to antagonize Beijing on the question of the eventual unification of Taiwan
and China– such as, for example, holding a Taiwan-wide referendum on “independence.”
As a democrat, I’m not sure feel totally comfortable with Beijing’s gruff
insistence on majoritarian PRC control over the political destinies of Chinese-peopled
polities around its periphery like Hong Kong, Macao, or Taiwan. (Though
Hong Kong’s situation under its gradual re-unification process with Big China
is not totally bad, either, far as I can see.)
As a U.S. citizen who is eager to see a right relationship between US power
and that of the rest of the world, I am intrigued by the steady growth in
Chinese influence. (And as a democrat, I have to note that China’s population
is some 4.5 times that of the US. So if we go with a one-peron-one-vote
approach its influence should be much greater than Washington’s.)
Anyway, here I am. There I was yesterday, in a slightly Stalinoid-decored
conference hall– logistic arrangements, including simultaneous interpretation
among the three conference languages of Chinese, French, and English, all
working almost perfectly. In the morning we had a welcome address from
Deputy Foreign Minister Mr. Dai Bingguo. I noted that though he and
the Chinese official who spoke in the afternoon, China’s Special Envoy to
the ME Peace Process Wang Shijie, both spoke in Chinese, they both also seemed
quite able to communicate very well in English, as well. The inverse
could hardly, of course, be said of their counterparts in Washington!
Dai noted the importance of the Palestinian issue in world affairs and stressed
that “only peaceful means” of resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
can work. He urged the greater promotion of the UN’s role in peacemaking.
He stressed that there should be justice in international mediation
efforts– and that there should not be “bias” in mediation. He said
all the rights of the Palestinians including their right to create an independent
Palestinian state should be assured. He said that suicide bombings
should be “checked effectively.” (An Israeli peacenik sitting next
to me, MK Zahava Gal-On, got a little exercized over her understanding of
that phrase. “They want to see the effectiveness of suicide bombings
checked?” she asked me. I told her I understood that “checked” in the
context of Dai’s speeech most likely meant “stopped”. Of such linguistic
misunderstandings can major crises be born.)
Continue reading “The UN, Palestine– and Beijing”