After arriving back in the US from Uganda, I spent most of last week at the
Annual Sessions of
Baltimore Yearly Meeting
of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers). For those who don’t
know much about the practice of Quakers (Friends), I should
note that here along the east coast of the USA, we still organize our
congregations in much the same way that they have been organized since the
denomination was founded, during the whole ferment of religious innovation
and expression that welled up during the civil war in mid-17th century Britain.
That is, we don’t have any “hireling priests”, or indeed any power-wielding religious hierarchy or fixed liturgy, at all. Our internal organization
is extremely egalitarian. Our local congregations are called “Monthly
Meetings”, because while they gather once or more per week to worship together,
they (we) conduct the business of the congregation during a special “Meeting
for Worship with a Concern for Business” that is held once a month. And
then, most of the Monthly Meetings are grouped together in geographically
larger organizations called “Yearly Meetings”, which do their business together–
you guessed– once a year.
My monthly meeting, Charlottesville, is part of
Baltimore Yearly Meeting
(BYM). So what we were doing last week was conducting this group’s
business together. BYM brings together Quakers from Virginia, Maryland, the
District of Columbia, and some portions of southern and western Pennsylvania.
To our north is Philadelphia Yearly Meeting– a large one, given that
Philadelphia and its surrounding state of Pennsylvania were
founded by Quaker colonists
back in the late 17th century. There is also New York YM, New England
YM; and other YMs to the south of us.
I’ve been going to BYM annual sessions for four years now. I really
love Quaker process, which I think is a great gift to the world. For example, we always do our congregational business in a clear spirit of religious worship: what we are searching for together in these meetings is a Spirit-led unity; and often, when the way forward doesn’t seem exactly clear, we will just settle into silent worship together and wait for the guidance of the Spirit. Also,
we never take votes. Instead, it is the job of the person running the meeting–
the “clerk”– to discern what the Spirit-led “sense of the meeting” is on any decision.
One deeply convinced Friend can hold up the attainment of a decision,
and such a dissenter is always given a close and loving listening. Perhaps
she or he is indeed the one who knows the truth or can provide the best answer!
As a result, the process of reaching a united “sense of the meeting”
on crucial issues can sometimes feel very slow. But once
the meeting body has found such unity, then that unity is very strong.
BYM has a Presiding Clerk with great gifts of gentle leadership and spiritual
centeredness. Her name is Lauri Perman. It is a joy to watch
her working, and I always try to learn from how she clerks our big sessions
there.
This year, we have been (quietly) celebrating the fact that it is exactly
350 years since the first Quaker “traveling minister” came to north America
from Britain. Her name was Elizabeth Harris, and where she landed was
in Anne Arundel County on the Chesapeake Bay, which is currently part of
Maryland but was then part of Virginia. Friend Elizabeth preached a
lot up and down the Chespeake, and soon there were enough Monthly Meetings
founded in these parts to establish the first Yearly Meeting on this continent,
which happened in 1672. That was Baltimore Yearly Meeting, which this
year was holding its 335th annual session. We didn’t hold it
in Baltimore, however. This year we were once again occupying a small
(and air-conditioned) wing of James Madison University in the Shenandoah
Valley area of Virginia, about one hour west of Charlottesville…
In our session, we certainly took note of these anniversaries. But we were
also considering and praying on some very current concerns, including the
wars raging in the Middle East, the militarism of our own country and its
many harmful consequences, the endangered status of civil liberties in our
country, the threats that our gay and lesbian members face in their lives–
and of course, the incredibly strong witness for peace and universal love
that was sustained by our beloved Friend Tom Fox, who was killed in Iraq
in March while working for Christian Peacemaker Teams. I went to three very
moving sessions that focused on Friend Tom’s life, work, and witness. He
had been a member of Langley Hill Monthly Meeting (in northern Virginia)
for a number of years before he felt astrong leading to join CPT and go to
Iraq with them. I will confess that I feel I could receive a similar
kind of leading at some point; and learning more about Tom’s life, and the
strong support system his meeting and other supporters established for him
made me thinkthat I should become a bit more intentional about some
of the witness-type things I do in my life, too.
… One of the things I’ve come to understand better over the years is the degree
to which we Quakers have done things– here in the US as elsewhere in the
world– that, though they were generally very well intentioned, ended up
being extremely harmful to other people. We haven’t been saints in any way.
(Well, most of us, that is.) For example, Quakers tried to deal
fairly with the indigenous people whom we encountered here. One famous
New England Quaker, Mary Dyer, even ended up getting executed by the Puritans
because of her stubborn insistence that the “Indians” here had souls and
should be included in Christian congregations. But the Quakers were,
nonetheless, part of a much larger wave of European-origined colonists who
swept over the land from 1607 onwards, protected by the armies of the British
Crown as they grabbed the land, hunting-grounds, and fishing-grounds of the
indigenes… And in later years, Quakers were deeply implicated in
undertaking the “cutural genocide” of Indian communities by participating
in projects to forcibly remove Indian children from their families and (re-)educate
them in whitefolk-run boarding schools… Possibly well-intentioned but in
practice extremely paternalistic and destructive to the Indian communities.
For a century or so after their first arrival here, many Quakers here as
in England were also– along with members of all other denominations in America
except, I think, for the Mennonites and the Brethren–deeply involved
in the whole institution of slavery: holding slaves, trading in slaves, and
shipping enslaved persons transoceanically in quite large numbers… It was not till the 1750s
that a small group of Quakers in (mainly) Philadelphia began speaking out
and saying that slavery was quite wrong and un-Christian. And then–
with wrenching slowness– attitudes within the Religious Society of Friends
started to change. Once they had changed definitively, by the 1790s
or so, Quakers became firm upholders of the abolitionist cause. Most
of the Quakers who then lived in Virginia found at that point that the soil
here was too poor to be able to farm it in an economically viable way without
using slave labor… So they sold their farms here and moved to Ohio and
the midwest, starting some large Quaker congregations there, as well.
So as I said, we Quakers haven’t been saints at all. But we have tried
to do the right thing. And equally importantly, we have tried to keep
ourselves open to new insights, new evidence, and new revelations that would show us what
the “right thing” to do is, in any situation. Along the way, we have
tried to hold firm to our basic testimonies: our testimony against war, violence, and militarism;
our testimony on human equality; our testimony on simplicity; and our over-riding
conviction that “there is that of G-d in every person.”
Anyway, it’s late. I have a big week ahead. But I did want to
jot down these notes here, which are part of my continuing effort to figure
out what it means to be a Quaker in America today.
I applaud your personal commitments. It is so important for members of all religious groups to keep open minds in order to acknowledge and learn from past wrongs, bearing witness to the fact that such an open mind is essential for doing the right thing in the present moment.
Only if your critics on this website would adopt the same commitments, and stop their repetitive assaults on reasonable and logical analysis with such a dizzying array of circuitous arguments. If one could put a finger on the single cause of mayhem in the Middle East today, then it must be the bizarre (apparently intentional) inability of members of a particular religious group to bear the mental and spiritual weight of universal openness.
Members of this group appear uniquely unable to acknowledge and learn from their past wrongs, and finally commit to doing the right thing in the present. Instead they react self(ish)-righteously in the present moment as if they alone confront the perpetual threat that comes with living as mere mortals on a fragile earth. As a result members of this group end up behaving in truly paranoid fashion. They strike out with excessive force, blinded by their own childish illogic, and end up perpetuating the same wrongs of the past.
One day members of all human groups must demonstrate the same commitment to keeping an open mind.
Sd, you must be tuned to a different wavelength. I find Helena’s propaganda systematically anti-American and hateful part of the time. What should I do, repeat some Quaker mantra and nod? Words have consequences, people act on them, the Seattle Pakistani attacker shot and killed women, even a pregnant woman. Is his religion the one you had in mind in your lame diatribe?
“What should I do, repeat some Quaker mantra and nod?”
Are you in that paranoid group I mentioned, Davis? Do you imagine you are in a great contest with the forces of darkness?
Helena’s website and this comment section are not directed at you. The world does not revolve around your life. The sun shines and the rain falls across the whole earth. And God is present for all living beings here on this marvelous planet.
Maybe you need to check into some kind of asylum to recover good health. Your lacking an open mind is clearly too much of a burden for you to handle.
I am having a hard time deciphering what you are talking about, Davis. How are Helena Cobban’s words “propaganda”, “anti-American”, or “hateful”?
As to Sd’s comment, how is it a “diatribe” and how is it “lame”?
We can either engage in an exchange of ideas or we can hurl insults at one another. What ideas or suggestions to improve the state of affairs in the world would you like to offer, Davis?
Just for clarity, I have no idea who “Sd” is, and I have never met Helena Cobban.
Where I am, (you have visited Helena but that may not narrow it down as much as my IP address) the funny thing about the few Quakers I have met is they appeared to be agnostics. This seemed a little complex if not contradictory. Your notes about Quakers in America reminded me of those meetings. I imagine it must be hard to marry honest witnessing, (what I understand of it)empiricism and humanism with an original core of trascendant christian faith.
But then planning to make only honest mistakes in well-intentioned actions and to learn by them is perhaps no more than spiritual common sense; which as we can see is anything but common. And none of us, even the saints, are perfect or totally consistent souls.