US commanders understand Iraq mission’s failure

This little piece of reporting by Capitol Hill Blue’s Doug Thompson looks very significant. (Hat-tip to Juan Cole for flagging it.)
Thompson writes:

    Military commanders in the field in Iraq admit in private reports to the Pentagon the war “is lost” and that the U.S. military is unable to stem the mounting violence killing 1,000 Iraqi civilians a month.
    Even worse, they report the massacre of Iraqi civilians at Haditha is “just the tip of the iceberg” with overstressed, out-of-control Americans soldiers pushed beyond the breaking point both physically and mentally.
    “We are in trouble in Iraq,” says retired army general Barry McCaffrey. “Our forces can’t sustain this pace, and I’m afraid the American people are walking away from this war.”
    Marine Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has clamped a tight security lid on the increasingly pessimistic reports coming out of field commanders in Iraq, threatening swift action against any military personnel who leak details to the press or public.

McCaffrey has been in Iraq fairly recently and was one of the Iraq experts called in to a small-group meeting with Pres. Bush last week. I just hope that Bush (1) allowed McCaffrey enough time to give an honest report on what he had seen, and (2) listened to him carefully and understood what he was hearing.
I’ve been pretty busy over the past few days writing two pieces that I consider important on the theme that the failure of the Bushite project in Iraq is now clear. One is my column for Thursday’s CSM. The other is a longer think-piece that should appear on Salon.com tomorrow.
It has become increasingly clear to me over recent weeks that:

    (1) The US military has no ability and no plan for resolving Iraq’s interlocking crises of public security collapse, infrastructural breakdown, and prolonged political impasse. These problems are unevenly distributed through the country. But the fact that the insecurity is greatest of all within the huge metropolis of Baghdad, the hub of the country, is fatal to the Bushite project.
    (2) The political process being shepherded forward by Viceroy Khalilzad has been going nowhere. Here we are, now nearly 6 months after that much-hyped national election of december 15, and the country still doesn’t have a full government!
    (3) Also, Juan Cole’s daily events-in-Iraq blog, which used to contain many tidbits of internal Iraqi political news, has become almost totally a lengthy daily catalogue of grisly deaths and mayhem. (And of course it’s not just Juan… That is, unfortunately, most of the news that’s happening inside Iraq these days.)

Invading Iraq was– as I note in both the pieces I’ve been writing– a huge roll of the geopolitical dice by the Bushites. That they have lost the “game” they played there there will have huge repurcussions– both in Iraq, and far beyond.
Here, just as a benchmark, is the lead to the column I had in the CSM on January 9, 2003:

    Any use of massive violence such as that Washington is now threatening against Iraq is a terrible thing.
    Everything we know about violence gives two clear lessons. First, the use of force always has unintended – often quite unpredictable – consequences. And second, war in the modern era always disproportionately harms civilians.

And here’s how I finished it:

    Mr. President, there is still time to stop this war. True, the build-up toward it has already been very expensive. But you should not conclude that the fact of those already sunk costs locks you into a path of war against Iraq from which there is no escape. If you launch this war, then the cost – in dollars, in human suffering, and in unfolding strategic chaos around the Middle East and the world – will be unimaginably greater than anything you’ve spent to date.
    Turn back. You have many friends in the US and around the world who will eagerly help you find a way to do so.

He didn’t listen to me, or to any others of the hundreds of experts in Middle Eastern and world affairs who warned him this would turn out badly… I am crying for the people of Iraq this week. I just hope they can find a way to hold their country together and bind up the wounds they are all currently suffering.

8 thoughts on “US commanders understand Iraq mission’s failure”

  1. McCaffrey was himself accused of war crimes during Gulf war 1. I think he commanded a unit which massacred surrendering Iraqi soldiers.
    His unit also buried some Iraqis alive who were in trenches; first they positioned armoured vehicles around the trenches to shoot fleeing soldiers and them tanks equipped with blades buried them.

  2. I have heard of the same autrocities cited above, although no one knows how many Iraqi troops were buried alive (this means the USA made mass graves in Iraq even before 2003). The troops that reportedly did this were not able to handle a large number of Iraqi POW or surrendering troops, so they buried them alive.
    By the way, Capitol Hill Blue is not considered to be very reliable. Democracy Now is reliable.

  3. Helena
    Poor Riverbend has a new post.
    I have no idea how to respond to her though she has my deepest sympathy.

  4. “I fear his military actions go against to the parting advice of two former ones, both men who had fought wars. In his valedictory George Washington admonished us to beware of foreign entanglements, and the Middle East is likely to be as entangling as quicksand. The departing Dwight Eisenhower bade us beware of the military industrial complex, and that complex seems mightier than ever, now that it has either co-opted or coerced the media.”
    http://homepage.mac.com/kaaawa/iblog/C177199123/E20050823090852/

  5. “McCaffrey was himself accused of war crimes during Gulf war 1”
    And then he is free
    “We should note that the Army cleared McCaffrey of wrongdoing,”
    Exactly like Haditha atrocities, Al-Ishaki, and Faluja before also Britt’s solders also they cleared of wrongdoing in regards of killing Iraqis.
    Look to this fresh report for more crimes and evidences they are bravery heroes and now they are expert in gorilla wars and speaking with long tongues
    “We said that napalm had been used, because napalm is a bomb which is a fuel bomb that burns only on the exposed part of the body, so that the clothes will not be affected,” Dr Ismael said from Perth at the start of a speaking tour.
    Doctors For Iraq, an independent group founded in 2003, is calling for an international investigation that would allow the bodies to be exhumed for autopsies “because we want to know the truth of what happened”.
    http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/iraq-doctor-brings-evidence-of-us-napalm/2006/05/22/1148150185038.html

  6. Lets be honest with ourselves…
    Iraq is lost. And the true victims are innocent Iraqis. The fact that the situation reminds us of Lebanon is not a good sign. The spiral only gets steeper…
    Liminal

Comments are closed.