Ninety-five or so years ago a teenager in New Zealand, hearing news of the– perhaps still “heroic”– early phases of the British involvement in the Great War, was desperate to enlist, but too young to do so. So he borrowed his elder brother’s birth certificate and went to enlist in the Otago Rifles.
(What on earth were his parents thinking?)
I believe his name was Cyril Howard Marlow. His brother’s name was George Stanley Marlow, so that was the name Cyril adopted upon enlistment.
The family have, as yet, no records of the early months of his service. But I think that by August he was in Gallipoli, and perhaps had been there for some months already.
Conditions of service for all the New Zealanders who fought in World War I were extremely harsh, and they were achingly far from home. (There was even a Maori Battalion. Can you imagine the kinds of assignments they got, and how those Maoris serving a distant British king felt about it all?)
Gallipoli is a 20-mile-long peninsula that forms the northern shore of the vital Dardanelles Strait, that links the Aegean to the Sea of Marmara. The British imperial war command wanted to take the peninsula from the Ottoman Empire, and Australians and New Zealanders formed a significant part of the invasion force that landed in April 1915. Things did not go well for any of the invaders… By August 1915 they were badly bogged down; and that month saw some notable setbacks for them, as the nimble Ottoman defenders commanded by the 34-year-old Lt.-Col. Mustafa Kemal found ways to trap them and push them back.
(I’ve blogged previously about the importance the Gallipoli battles paradoxically came to have in the formation of Australian and N.Z. national identity, including here.)
So, back to Cyril Howard Marlow… What we do know about the lad is that, most likely, he was wounded at Gallipoli and evacuated on one of the stream of hospital ships that carried the casualties from there to military hospitals the British rapidly organized on the island of Malta.
On September 12, 1915, he died in one of those hospitals. He was buried under the name he’d used to enlist with, that of George Stanley Marlow, in the military cemetery at Pieta (Our Lady of Sorrows), a small town just outside the Maltese capital, Valetta.
Today, I went to visit his grave. The meticulous record-keeping of the Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC) enabled me to find it fairly easily.
George Stanley Marlow was my grandfather. He lived in London by the time Cyril Howard died. Seven months after Cyril’s death, George’s wife gave birth to their first child, who was my mother.
Later, the couple had another daughter, and then a much longed-for son. The son was named Howard Norman, in memory of his paternal uncle, deceased at Gallipoli, and his maternal uncle Norman Williams, who also perished in World War I.
Howard Norman Marlow enlisted as an aviator in World war II and was killed in North Africa.
The cemetery in which Cyril Howard Marlow lies is a testament to the tragedy and criminality of war. The grave he is buried in– like all those in the WW-I section of the cemetery– contains the bodies of three deceased servicemen. The CWGC says on its website that this because of the difficulty of digging numerous, appropriately deep graves during the conditions of war. That’s as may be. But what also became evident from the walk I took around the cemetery was that in the weeks between late August 1915 and the middle of October, the Commonwealth soldiers were being buried there at an extremely fast rate. In fact, just about all of the graves I saw in the section of the cemetery, which contains the crammed-together remains of more than 1,300 soldiers– most of them Brits but with a strong representation of “ANZACs”– had dates of death listed in just that short, seven-week period of late summer 1915.
If those were the ones who survived long enough to die on Malta, imagine how many more died in the hospital ships along the way and had to be buried at sea. Imagine how many more died on the field of battle itself.
So I guess that Cyril Howard was “lucky” to survive as long as he did and to end up buried in a sweet, peaceful cemetery in Pieta, Malta, in a place where his great-niece can come visit his grave.
One of my sisters tells me that my grandfather came to Malta once, to visit his little brother’s grave. That must have been an odd sensation– seeing your own name on a gravestone.
But he died in 1956 or so, when I was still a little girl, so I can’t ask him about it.
… And then, of course, I can’t help but contrast my own ability to go pay my respects at the grave of this ancestor, and the way the CWGC carefully tends the graves of the British dead around the world, with the way the Simon Wiesenthal Center of Los Angeles has been trying to tear up the extremely ancient Ma’moun Allah (“Mamilla”) cemetery in West Jerusalem.
I am really delighted to see that various U.S. civil rights organizations, including the Center for Constitutional Rights and the National Lawyers Guild, have been taking up the campaign to stop the Wiesenthal Center in its tracks there. Their project, which is to build a so-called “Museum of Tolerance” right on the site of that ancient cemetery, is an outrage.
7 thoughts on “My grandfather goes looking for his own grave (and other Maltese mysteries)”
Comments are closed.
I much admire Ataturk’s efforts to defend his country, up to the expulsion of the Greeks in 1923. Though I don’t think much of his destruction of Ottoman culture. Hardly any Turks today have access to their past, as the alphabet was changed.
However, as I understood it, the fault in Gallipoli lay with the generals (British). The plan was to take Istanbul by a coup de force. Good idea. But first the Navy ran onto mines in the Dardanelles (the narrows between Gallipoli and the Asian mainland), and so they decided to land at the foot of the Gallipoli peninsula, instead of at the head where it joins the mainland. And then having landed, they didn’t advance, against no opposition, and left time to Ataturk to assemble resistance.
I quite agree about the importance of this fatuous defeat for the creation of Australian and New Zealand identity. It identified the doubt of quite why ANZACs were fighting for a cause that didn’t concern them. The Second World War was less of a problem, as the menace was clear, though Australian/NZ troops were still fighting in the Middle East, when Singapore was being attacked.
Wiesenthal Center is engaged in a campaign of provocation which is, indeed, outrageous.
The US government could put an end to this nonsense in a minute, that it does not does so leads one to the conclusion that it favours such provocations, aimed to offend and anger not simply the local population or even the Islamic world but decent people everywhere.
Is the US aim to demonstrate that the world must submit to such humiliations and insults?
Or is it Israel which is showing that there really is no limit to the follies into which it can tempt the US government?
This sort of think may play well in Peoria, but it will cost lives in Pakistan.
Helena – One of the most searing moments of my Life was reading Ataturk’s words at the Gallipoli Memorial. I stood there with tears rolling down my cheeks as I read:
“Those heroes that shed their blood and lost their lives,you are now living in the soil of a friendly country. Therefore rest in peace. There is no difference between the Johnnies and the Mehmets to us where they lie side by side here in this country of ours. You, the mothers, who sent their sons from faraway countries wipe away your tears; your sons are now lying in our bosom and are in peace, after having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well.”
Ataturk, 1934
As an Otago man, I think it important to recognise that in the early 20th century (and right through to the late 1940s) many white New Zealanders thought of England as “home”. To fight for King and Country was indeed seen as a glorious endeavour, as well as an opportunity to see the world. And again, many Maori also saw fighting in the Maori Battalion as an opportunity to prove their mana as a warrior. The impact of Gallipoli and the fields of Flanders on New Zealand was horrific, the loss of men from small towns across New Zealand was devastating as was the horror and violence those returning brought home to New Zealand after the war. Misguided and jingoistic they certainly were, and in many cases commanded with incredible incompetence and arrogance by British officers; but sadly a tragedy that most New Zealanders still celebrate as the glory of war at every cenotaph in every town and city across New Zealand on Anzac Day each year. They talk about it as the “coming of age” of New Zealanders, as though this senseless slaughter made ‘men’ of us all.
Glad to see you back blogging again. I look forward to reading the link you said you would provide on CS options for Jerusalem.
I find your reference at the end of this post to be an important point. Once I recall you posted on the dual memorial Turkey and NZ (or perhaps it was Australia) built to remember their soldiers who died in WW I.
What will it take for Israel’s government to recognize the common humanity of Palestinian Muslims and Christians who are buried beneath its soil? Whether in centuries past, or those who died in the Nakba and following decades.
Then, and only then, could Israelis begin to treat the living Palestinians as equals and neighbors, and peace might finally come to the land.
Keep up your valiant blogging!
Helena,
I regularly enjoy your post but lately I’ve noticed that your blog entries are just random rants and ramblings. I doubt this will increase any discussion toward a just solution to any conflict. The peace community has enough “complainers” and I find that yours is especially annoying if not overly pedantic.
-James
“If you don’t create change, change will create you”
James Robinson, are you related to the American Ambassador on Malta?