Syria’s place in the world community– which the ideologues in the Bush White House did so much to attack and delegitimize– has been strengthening noticeably in the past few days/weeks.
Later this week, Sen. John Kerry, the new chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, will visit Syria. Ahead of the visit, he said the Obama administration is eager to talk to Syria. The US has not had an ambassador there since 2005, though it does have an embassy.
From a domestic US perspective, it is extremely important that this rapprochement win solid support in both houses of Congress, since under pressure from the pro-Israel lobby– as well as the Bush administration– Congress has itself been another major driver of the “isolate and attack Syria” campaign.
At a regional level, Syria has won some new influence, too. Yesterday, the head of Saudi Arabia’s intelligence service, Prince Muqrin bin Abdul-Aziz, visited Syria where he met President Bashar al-Asad and conveyed from King Abdullah (his older half-brother), a message about “bilateral ties and the importance of consultation and coordination between the two sides”, according to the Syrian official news agency.
A rapprochement between Syria and Saudi Arabia– which have been at loggerheads since the assassination of former Lebanese PM Rafiq Hariri in February 2005– would be extremely significant for the politics of the entire region.
Western spinmeisters and MSM have made a huge point about the depth and alleged intractability of the rift between the alleged “moderates” and “extremists” in the Arab world, a rift that seemed particularly evident during the most recent Gaza crisis.
But most western commentators often have little idea about the depth and complexity of the regional dynamics that continue to underlie regional– and in particular, inter-Arab– relations. I find it interesting that these two regimes, in particular, now apparently see it in their interest to move towards some degree of rapprochement.
The political fallout from the Gaza crisis continues. Egypt has been, I think, somewhat strengthened in its role in the region– as I wrote last week. But so, too, has Syria. So the whole regional system remains dynamic, and certainly not easily reducible to some form of a zero-sum “moderates versus extremists” template.
4 thoughts on “Syria’s position strengthening internationally, regionally”
Comments are closed.
???????????
If Hamas agrees to re-submit to the PA under a unity government headed by Salaam Fayad then it would be nothing less than a major defeat for Hamas? It would mean the Oslo rejectionists had caved in to the PA recognition of Israel. Such an outcome would be astounding, but it would certainly be in line with Obama’s public diplomacy so far – the continuation of the Bush/Rice position.
In all this sudden enthusiasm for Egypt, it should not be forgotten that it was Egypt who trained the PA security forces blamed for preciptating the Hamas military coup.
Damaskus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!scönste Stadt in der Welt!!!!!!!!!!!
If one is forced to use a moderates versus extremists paradigm here, it is clearly the Saudis who are the extremists and the Syrians who are the moderates, and not vice versa. But of course this is not the American version of reality, it is the real world version of reality.
Excellent point, Shirin. One worth making over and over and over… Maybe one day it’ll sink in?