I wish I had more time to spend on moderating the discussions on this blog, which frequently become shrill and excessively combative. On the other hand, most readers are adults who can figure out for themselves whether and how to “read” the comments boards.
In general, though, the ability to have this kind of cross-continental, open-ended discussion is a treasure that I don’t want to curtail too much. It really does allow for the creation of new knowledge and new understanding. (I have long believed that knowledge is an essentially social rather than individual creation… I mean, who taught Tom Hobbes and John Locke to speak and to express themselves, in the first place? Their ability to reason and to argue sure as heck didn’t “grow like mushrooms out of the ground” at all…. Ooops, end of communitarian rant, here.)
So anyway, I thought readers might like to see some useful new knowledge being created in these two portions of the blogosphere:
- — Jonathan’s recent post (and the subsequent discussion) on the constitution and meaning of the Hamas government lineup, and
— Reidar Visser’s comment (in particular), as posted onto my post here yesterday about the continuing, extremely high-stakes political wrangling in Iraq.
Once JWN readers and commenters see how constructive discussions like this actually work, and how they serve us all by expanding the available knowledge base, perhaps you will all be a bit more mindful that this effect does not occur if people get into name-calling of the “hateful Helena” (or “hateful anyone else”) variety, or if they don’t actually make an effort to contribute new knowledge or their own thoughtfully conceived questions to the discussion. Also, it doesn’t really occur very easily if people go wildly off topic.
… One thing I’ve considered here is to see if anyone wants to take on the role of JWN’s “Bernhard”. Bernhard is the guy who started a parallel-universe blog called Moon of Alabama, where people could comment on Billmon’s Whiskey Bar blog, after Billmon shut down his comment section. MoA has evolved quite a bit since then.
Bernhard’s comments here are interesting. Actually, suddenly I’m thinking: why not ask Bernhard to run a JWN comment-site?
Does anyone have any other suggestions? Mail me.
btw
Thank you.
Helena, thanks for linking and mentioning Moon of Alabama.
Why should your comment’s be needed to run elsewhere. Your blog is doing fine. Keep posting.
Thanks
Bernhard
I really appreciate yr kind words, Bernhard. But the thing is this: moderating the comments here takes a heck of a lot of time, and I’m sorely tempted to do the Olympian Billmon thing and just shut ’em down completely.
But then, I also greatly value some parts of the discussion here (and get some useful batting practice in other parts of it, too)…
What to do? Run an “approved commenter” system? Close down my comments in the hope that that would jerk you or someone else to open up a parallel-universe site? I’m still searching for anwers…
Visser can be interested in this technology. Look how Wiki current events cover Ukrainian elections.
@Helena –
just let the comments run their course. Check once daily for spam and just delete it.
Trolls will leave when nobody feeds them.