Such terrifying pictures and information coming out regarding yesterday’s Indian Ocean tsunami. They remind me of the urgency of us all starting to think and act like a single world community. The BBC has been reporting– so far– some 23,000 people known to have been killed. But the numbers are certainly rising.
So many people killed; their families bereaved. So many more badly injured. So many more again left homeless or otherwise vulnerable to the rapid spread of disease. So many hundreds of thousands of families’ and communities’ lives ruptured forever.
Human beings have incredible resilience. But if we were all, truly, a single human family, wouldn’t the leaders of the rich countries all now set aside their pursuit of marginal advantage here or there and say, “Yes! This where we can all pull together to make a difference!”
Instead of which, the Bush administration has announced it will contribute just $15 million worth of aid to the relief effort. A tragically small amount. And this, just a week after it marked the approach of Christmas by saying it would anyway be cutting back on huge amounts of emergency aid previously earmarked for the world’s poorest nations…
All this, while it continues to spend more than $250 million each day on waging the war in Iraq.
It’s obscene.
Why can’t the world’s leaders call an Asia-wide ceasefire– a ceasefire of all the conflicts now going on in the Asia-Pacific region, including those in Iraq, Sri Lanka, and elsewhere? Let’s call in the UN to regulate and resolve all those conflicts; and concentrate meanwhile on delivering all the longterm development aid that the storm-hit communities will need over the next five years.
I think that’s what a true “family” would do, don’t you?
And while we’re about it, if we were all one family, why would the Western media want to continue with its childishly self-centered focus on the problems that the storm surges have brought to westerners merely vacationing in what these media routinely refer to as “holiday islands”? As though these shore-side locations are not, more importantly, the permanent homes of many thousands times more numerous gatherings of human being who just happen not to be western, not to have white skins?
At least that majority of the western tourists who have survived these storms have intact homes to go back to. But how about the indigenous people of Sri Lanka, Thailand, Aceh, and the other hard-hit places? What has happened to the homes and lives of those people is a hundred times more devastating.
But there on the BBC t.v. feed this evening were the anchor (Mike Embley) and one of the correspondents, a white guy in Sri Lanka, blithely conflating the categories of “people” and “western tourists” as though no-one who didn’t fall into that latter category really counted as “people” at all….
As in this exchange (as I remember it):
- Embley: I gather that people have been told to make their way from Galle to the capital, Colombo?
Correspondent: Yes, people have been told that that’s the only way out. And in case they’ve lost their travel documents, the British Embassy is opening a special office to issue documents that will allow them to get home…
And only after that extraordinarily solipsistic exchange did the two of them start to talk about the very much larger numbers of Sri Lankans who had been even harder hit by the tsunami’s waves.
If the BBC wants to be taken seriously as a global means of communication, it will certainly have to do do a lot better than that.
Meanwhile there are, as always, important lessons to be remembered about the contribution that sound local governance can make to the ability of communities to withstand and survive horrifying natural disasters. Last September I noted a few contrasts between the way that Cuba and Haiti were able to deal with the after-effects of that season’s hurricanes in the Caribbean. (Cuba: fairly well. Haiti: abominably poorly.) This time around, we can certainly forecast that this disaster will place a huge strain on the national governments in all the affected countries. How well will they deal with this? Let’s see.
There are some things, though, that money can and do should for all the affected communities. One is to set up decent, region-wide, technical early-warning systems– like they have in the Pacific but not, sadly, until now in the Indian Ocean. Another worthwhile thing (which also requires good local administration, in addition to some resources) is to make sure there’s a sound, well-rehearsed plan for responding to any warnings that come along.
Those are all great things to do over the long and medium terms. But first: can’t we all just start thinking a little like a single human family, and get our priorities and attitudes in line with that? Imagine what a wonderful, warm, and high-achieveing “family” this could be, and what we could all become together!
I mourn that this has not happened yet. But mainly, right now, I’m mourning for all the people whose lives have been lost or torn apart by this storm. All that amazing human potential, all that concentrated human loving-kindness and wisdom: gone, agonizingly, just like that. And their loved ones mourning, picking up, and having to carry on.
And to think about 3 times this number of people have perished in the American war on Iraq… and many times more during sanctions…
yes, this tsunami is a horrible tragedy. Everyone, please help any way you can. And SimonC, I am afraid that more people will die from this tsunami than the Iraq war (so far, anyway). This has the potential of killing many from disease and malnutrition.
However, death from natural disasters, while still grief inducing, seems more palpable than death from human violence.
This headline from the Chicago Tribune pretty much sums it up… “Bush gala has big donations pouring in; Businesses, individuals to provide $40 million for 2nd inauguration, set to military theme”
You might argue that $250 mill / per day for the Iraq war is unavoidable, if regrettable. But this? This really is obscene!
Well said, Helena. Another problem with disaster relief in general is that it tends to focus on short-term humanitarian aid to the virtual exclusion of long-term rehabilitation of the affected people and infrastructure. A year from now, the donor countries will have mostly forgotten south Asia, unless another disaster strikes in the interim.
I’m wondering about all the Sri Lankan guest workers in Lebanon. There must be thousands. I met a few when I was there, servants of friends and family members. Are these people able to contact family members? Is there any effort in Lebanon to help guest workers find their loved ones? THe Daily Star has not reported a single item about the tsunami. I realize they focus on Lebanon and the Arab world, but there are so many Sri Lankans living in closest quarters with their Lebanese employers that I can’t believe there’s nothing in the paper about it all.
OK, maybe I can believe it, but I’d like to see a change.
MSN reports that President Bush pledged $35 million aid as the “beginning” of the tsunami relief effort. You are saying that he offered “just” $15 million. Don’t you think that discrepancy kind of weakens your argument? It seems to me that you could make a good point without distorting the facts.
John
John, in case you hadn’t noticed a blog is published in real time. If you check the DATE and TIME of my post, you will find that the info I gave was the latest then available.
On Dec 28, an administration official–still not Bush in person– announced he would be adding an additional $20 million to the amount earlier announced.
My broader point about the paltriness of the offer certainly still stands.
Of course, since I published that post many factors–including, crucially, the death toll– have changed considerably. Actually, the International Federation of Red cross and Red cres ent Societies is now reporting that the total death toll may exceed 100,000. So if we keep things “proportional” here, the US administration should immediately more than quadruple the size of its earliest offer…
I ain’t holding my breath (though I live in hope).
$44 million is roughly what Rupert Murdoch spent on his New York apartment the other day.
Some comparisons are more odious than others, not so?
I just got a note back from somebody at the Daily Star. They say that 1) the International Herald Tribune is covering this story extensively (and the person’s organization was listed as IHT/Daily STar). Presumably for extensive tsunami news, Daily Star readers should turn to the IHT.
My correspondent also says that 2) the Daily Star has a front page story on the topic today. I see one opinion piece on the website but maybe the paper is different.
I still wonder about all those Sri Lankan maids in Lebanon – how are they reacting? Will the Daily Star think their stories are worth reporting?