You can now find my CSM column dated for Thursday November 13. It’s here. In it, I argue:
- Vietnamization, like Iraqification, was accompanied by a lot of rhetoric about “democratization. “But because it was rushed, politically driven, and pursued unilaterally by the US according to US timetables, Vietnamization was a dangerous fiasco for most of the people of Vietnam and helped usher in the period of abusive communist rule that followed. It “succeeded” only in that it helped Nixon win reelection in 1972.
In Iraq, the stakes are even higher than they were in Vietnam. That’s why a botched “Iraqification” that is pursued nearly unilaterally by a rushed, politically driven US is in the interest of absolutely no one. But I truly don’t think that a successful Iraqification can happen if Washington continues trying to do it under its own almost unilateral control.
For everyone’s sake, the UN has to be invited to take over this vital process. The UN alone – not NATO, not the present US-led coalition – has the international legitimacy, and can command the international resources that are needed to get this job done.
But read the rest of it as well, and send your comments in HERE.
Thank goodness that the NYT in an editorial today (Nov. 13) takes much the same line.
Maybe the establishment, or part of it, is starting to come to its senses.
To Helena Cobban
please send me your E mail for an urgent issue
thanks
Quality control, n.:
Assuring that the quality of a product does not get out of hand
and add to the cost of its manufacture or design.
lipitor
texas holdem
texas holdem texas hold em online poker texas hold’em